What is generative engine optimization (GEO)?

Generative engine optimization (GEO) and answer engine optimization (AEO) are names for work that aims at visibility in AI answers. Whether that work differs from SEO depends on the source.

Last updated

What is generative engine optimization?

Generative engine optimization is work that aims to make a website more visible in answers written by AI systems. Google describes GEO as “work specifically focused on improving visibility in AI search experiences” (Google AI guide, updated 10 July 2026).

A research paper first posted in November 2023 introduced the name. It calls a generative engine a search system that gathers information from several sources and summarizes it with a language model (GEO paper, revised 28 June 2024).

What is answer engine optimization?

Answer engine optimization, or AEO, is a second name for the same kind of work. Google gives AEO and GEO one description, and it is the only primary source we found that defines AEO (Google AI guide, updated 10 July 2026).

We found no primary source that separates the two, and none that says who first used the term AEO. If someone sells AEO and GEO as two different services, ask for the source of the difference.

Is GEO different from SEO?

The sources disagree. Google says this work is still SEO, and the paper that named GEO treats it as a separate problem. If you came here after searching “GEO SEO”, both answers are below, each with its date.

We read these as answers to different questions. Google and Bing describe their own systems today, and the paper tested a research engine and the Perplexity of that time. That reading is ours, and no source states it.

What does “up to 40%” mean in the GEO paper?

It is the top of a range from a controlled test, and it tells you nothing about what your site can expect. The paper says its methods can “boost source visibility by up to 40% in generative engine responses” (GEO paper, revised 28 June 2024). These limits come from the same paper:

  • The test engine fetched “only the top 5 sources” from Google and wrote its answers with GPT-3.5 Turbo.
  • The test edited a source, then compared that source’s share of the answer. The share was the word count of the sentences that cite the source, adjusted for their position.
  • It did not measure whether a business name appeared in the answer.
  • On the Perplexity of that time, the best method gained 22% on the same measure, and keyword stuffing did 10% worse than the baseline.
  • The authors write that the “methods may need to adapt over time”.

The paper did not test today’s versions of ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Copilot or AI Overviews.

Which AI systems does this apply to?

Each vendor documents only its own system, so advice for one may not hold for another. This is what each one says about the web.

Each AI system page says how a scan collects an answer from that system, and the method says how we count.

What should you do with this?

Start with what the vendors document, and ask for proof of anything beyond it. How to get named in AI answers sorts common advice into what has support and what does not.

Apply the same care to any tool or service. Google says “No third-party tool has access to our internal ranking or AI systems” (Google AI guide, updated 10 July 2026), and nameblip is a third party too. We sell a paid scan, so weigh our advice with that in mind.

To see where you stand today, start a free scan. It counts the answers that name your business and shows each answer behind the count.

Sources

We read each source on 5 November 2026. The date on each line is the date on the page, or the day we read it when the page shows none.

Count how often AI systems name your business

A free first indication, with up to 12 answers on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode.